“When you have figures like Taylor Swift who are this big, maybe this is what prompts action from legislators and tech companies because they can’t afford to have America’s sweetheart be on a public campaign against them,” he said. Perhaps the same will be true about damaging AI-generated images, Decker suggested. In 2022, a Ticketmaster meltdown ahead of her Eras Tour concert sparked rage online, leading to several legislative efforts to crack down on consumer-unfriendly ticketing policies. Swift’s enormous contingent of loyal “Swifties” expressed their outrage on social media this week, bringing the issue to the forefront. “This is indicative of a larger kind of fracturing content moderation and platform governance because if all the stakeholders – the AI companies, social media companies, regulators and civil society – are not talking about the same things and on the same page about how to address these issues, this type of content is just going to continue to proliferate,” he added.ĭecker said, however, that Swift being targeted could bring more attention to the growing issues around AI-generated imagery. However, there is also a much wider world of unmoderated not-safe-for-work AI models in open source platforms, Decker said. The incident also coincides with the rise of AI-generation tools such as ChatGPT and Dall-E. Although some images were found on sites such as Instagram and Reddit, they were a widespread issue on X in particular. It’s unclear where the Taylor Swift-related images originated. Meta, too, made cuts to its teams that tackle disinformation and coordinated troll and harassment campaigns on its platforms, people with direct knowledge of the situation told CNN, raising concerns ahead of the pivotal 2024 elections in the US and around the world. ![]() (In the EU, X is currently being investigated over its content moderation practices). X, for example, has largely gutted its content moderation team and relies on automated systems and user reporting. “The social media companies don’t really have effective plans in place to necessarily monitor the content,” he said. “This is a prime example of the ways in which AI is being unleashed for a lot of nefarious reasons without enough guardrails in place to protect the public square,” Ben Decker, who runs Memetica, a digital investigations agency, told CNN.ĭecker said the exploitation of generative AI tools to create potentially harmful content targeting all types of public figures is increasing quickly and spreading faster than ever across social media. The incident comes as the United States heads into a presidential election year, and concerns are growing about how misleading AI-generated images and videos could be used to head up disinformation efforts and ultimately disrupt the vote. The company did not respond to CNN’s request for comment. Like most major social media platforms, X’s policies ban the sharing of “synthetic, manipulated, or out-of-context media that may deceive or confuse people and lead to harm.” Swift’s spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment. But nothing on the internet is truly gone forever, and they will undoubtedly continue to be shared on other, less regulated channels. The photos – which show the singer in sexually suggestive and explicit positions – were viewed tens of millions of times before being removed from social platforms. ![]() The fake images of Taylor Swift were predominantly circulating on social media site X, previously known as Twitter. ![]() Naturally, the Internet could not cope with seeing James in all his glory on their timeline, and not only was he trending on Twitter, but he quickly became August's biggest meme.Pornographic, AI-generated images of the world’s most famous star spread across social media this week, underscoring the damaging potential posed by mainstream artificial intelligence technology: its ability to create convincingly real and damaging images. "Yeah well i didn’t ask to have my security and privacy threatened either so this is me taking back ownership of the situation, move on with your day" ![]() And when someone tried to judge him for it, tweeting that "literally no one asked for this," James was quick to defend himself. "Hi I got my account back, just case I ever get hacked again, here’s the ONLY nude I’ve ever taken! can’t threaten me with it now get a life."Īttaching a picture of himself with nothing but his birthday suit on, we have to hand it to the 20-year-old for taking back control of a horrific situation. Once the 20-year-old got his account safely back, he tweeted the following to his 4 million followers: James, along with fellow YouTuber Shane Dawson, was hacked on Friday, but decided to take matters into his own hands after the hackers threatened to leak naked pictures of him. In news that you definitely weren't expecting to wake up to this morning, James Charles just leaked his own nude picture after his Twitter account was hacked.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |